How Marxism Took Over Education, The Workplace, Government, And The "Church."
(Personal note.)
by
Dean Gotcher
"If the 'restoring of life' of the world is to be conceived in terms of the Christian revelation [where, being told, men, women, and children, as the Son, have faith in and obey the Father, doing the Father's will], then Marx must collapse into a bottomless abyss." (Jürgen Habermas, Theory and Practice)
"For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts." Isaiah 55:8, 9
"No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon." Luke 16:13
"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16
"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15
When you decide right and wrong from your "self interest," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment,' that the world (the situation) is stimulating, esteeming your "self," i.e., 'justifying' your "self" (by which someone is able to seduce, deceive, and manipulate you—"stimulus-response"), you have to sacrifice, i.e., suspend, as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of your "self interest," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment,' that the world (the situation) is stimulating (by which someone is able to seduce, deceive, and manipulate you—"stimulus-response") in order to guarantee your desired outcome, i.e., your "self interest," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment,' that the world (the situation) is stimulating (by which someone is able to seduce, deceive, and manipulate you—"stimulus-response"), 'justifying' the negation of those (including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous) who get in the way of your "self interest," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world (the situation) is stimulating (by which someone is able to seduce, deceive, and manipulate you—"stimulus-response"). When you decide right from wrong from being told, i.e., from established commands, rules, facts, and truth, in order to hear, receive, and obey you have to suspend, as upon a cross, your "self interests," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment,' that the world (the situation) is stimulating, i.e., you have to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do right, obey, not sin (not yield to your "lusts").
"It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone [which deals with the flesh, i.e., "sense experience"], but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God [which deals with the soul, i.e., being told]." Matthew 4:4
You can either depend upon your own opinion, i.e., your "feelings," i.e., your "self interest," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world (the situation) is stimulating, i.e., your "sense experience," i.e., esteeming your "self," i.e., 'justifying' your "self," having to suspend, as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of your opinion, i.e., your "feelings," i.e., your "self interest," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world (the situation) is stimulating, i.e., your "sense experience," walking by sight in order to know right from wrong (you manipulate others and are manipulated by others by "feelings," i.e., carnal desires, by which someone is able to seduce, deceive, and manipulate you—"stimulus-response," e.g. Genesis 3:1-6) or trust in the Lord, i.e., God and His Word, knowing right from wrong by being told, having to humble, deny, die, control, discipline your "self," i.e., having to suspend, as upon a cross your carnal desires of the 'moment' that the world (the situation) is stimulating in order to hear and receive the truth, walking by faith instead. You persuade others and are persuaded by others with facts and truth, i.e., being told ("faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." Romans 10:17; "But without faith [being told] it is impossible to please him:" Hebrews 11:6).
"And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever." 1 John 2:16
The soul knows by being told. The flesh knows by "sense experience." From the garden in Eden on, those have been the only two choices. "Sense experience," dealing with your flesh, makes you subject to the world, which is passing away. Being told, dealing with your soul, makes you subject to God, who is eternal. "Sense experience" is based upon the child's carnal nature, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world stimulates (which are ever 'changing'). Being told is based upon the father's/Father's authority, where you have to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" i.e., suspend, as upon a cross, your carnal desires of the 'moment,' that the world is stimulating, i.e., quite dialoguing with, i.e., 'justifying' your "self" in order (as in "old" world order or "old school") to hear, receive, and then do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth (which are established), having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust"), confessing your wrong doing, disobedience, sins ("lusts"), asking for forgiveness, repenting (accepting chastening), humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining your "self," doing right and not wrong from then on.
"And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11
While dad and mom are not perfect, they may be (or may have been) down right tyrants—acting as children, using the office of authority they occupy for their own "selfish" purpose (pleasure)—the office they occupy is perfect, having been given to them by God, who is perfect, in which to serve Him. A father, in the true sense of the word, loves his children, hating their doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, holding them accountable for their actions—chastening them when they do wrong, disobey, sin that they might learn to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" and do right, obey, not sin, casting out (to the world) any who reject his authority in order to maintain his authority, i.e., God's order in the home.
"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 16:25
"The words 'seem to' are significant; it is the perception which functions in guiding behavior." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)
Replace being told with "sense experience" to know right from wrong and you 'change' the world, making it subject to the child's carnal nature instead of the father's/Father's authority. In defense of the child's carnal nature, i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., what "seemeth right unto a man," i.e., "human nature"—in defiance to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will—the "behavioral 'scientist,'" Carl Rogers wrote: "Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." "Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Rogers, on becoming a person) "Behavior 'science'" is based upon "seems to," i.e., "perception," i.e., opinion, i.e., the child's carnal nature, not upon being told, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., the father's/Father's authority. Dialogue, i.e., the language of psychology, for example, deals with the child's "feelings," i.e., what "seems to" be, while the father/Father, i.e., preaching, teaching, and discussing established commands, rules, facts, and truth, deals with what "is." Marxism comes in here, establishing the child's carnal nature, i.e., "human nature," i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., "sense experience" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority, i.e.,having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will—as you will see.
"Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning." James 1:17
Only God is good. When you dialogue your opinion (your "feelings") to a consensus (to a "feeling" of "oneness") with others in order to "enjoy" ("lust" after) the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world (situation) stimulates, i.e., when you decide right from wrong according to your carnal nature, i.e., according to your "self interests," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment,' that the world (situation) stimulates, 'justifying' your "self," i.e., your "lusts" before others, which is your nature, you become God ("good") in your own eyes, i.e., in your thoughts and in your actions (uniting, i.e., synthesizing your carnal/personal thoughts and carnal/social actions, known as "theory and practice"). In dialoguing your opinions to a consensus with others, i.e., "building relationship with others based upon your and their common self interests" you, trusting in your "self" and in them, negate the Lord and His Heavenly Father in your thoughts and action, i.e., you, leaning to your own understanding, i.e., your own "sense experiences," negate faith in Him, you, talking about your "self" and the things of the world that give you pleasure, negate acknowledge Him in all your ways, you, directing your own steps, negate His directing your paths, you, 'justifying' your "self" before others, negate your having a guilty conscience for sinning against Him and, seeing the need to repent, turn from your wicked ways, which instead "seemeth right," i.e., "good" in your eyes.
"Trust in the Lord with all thine heart, and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths." Proverb. 3: 5-6
"Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD." "Blessed is the man that trusteth in the LORD, and whose hope the LORD is." Jeremiah 17:5, 7
"It is not in man that walketh to direct his steps." Jeremiah 10:23
"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure, i.e., "self interest" is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth], and desperately wicked [hating the father's/Father's authority that "gets in the way," i.e. that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9
You can not see your hate of restraint as being evil, i.e., "wicked" because your love of pleasure, i.e., your "self interest," is in the way, blinding you to it. Like a drug, pleasure (dopamine emancipation), i.e., "self interest" which the world stimulates blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness" which is being expressed toward those who are preventing (or trying to prevent) you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation) when you are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning—making you not just wicked but "desperately wicked" in your effort to attain it, keep it, or get it back. In the praxis of the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process, you not only become intoxicated with, but addicted to and possessed by your "self" being 'justified' by others, with you then 'justifying' them, affirming your and their carnal nature, i.e., "self interests" over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority, i.e., knowing right from not wrong by being told. Only God can "fix" the heart problem. This is why man's efforts always fail, with socialism, i.e., Marxism at the head of the class, rejecting the Father's authority at all cost.
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9
Marxism is based upon what you have in common with others i.e., your and their carnal nature, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., "human nature" (which is the basis of common-ism). Marxism, by negating that which gets in the way of pleasure ("lust"), i.e., the father's/Father's authority, makes itself attractive to the young and the naive. That is why Marxism has so easily and successfully taken over education, the workplace, government, and even the "church." When you dialogue your opinions, i.e., your "feelings" ("lusts") to a consensus, i.e., to a "feeling" of "oneness" with others, in order to 'discover' the 'truth,' i.e., what is right and what is wrong,, i.e., what is good and what is evil, you reject the Father, and His Son Jesus Christ, i.e., "Christian revelation," making Karl Marx, i.e., your "self" and the world (that gives you pleasure) the "rock" of your salvation, i.e., salvation from the Father's authority, even if you, deceiving your "self" and taking pleasure in deceiving others, do it in the name of the Lord. The difference between Christ and the anti-Christ is Christ accepts the Father's authority, the anti-Christ does not. The "rock" of your salvation is really sand (shifting sand), dialogue having removed the true rock, i.e., the Father's authority that gets in the way of your "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (which are ever 'changing'), which the world (shifting sand) stimulate (by which someone is able to seduce, deceive, and manipulate you—"stimulus-response").
In a facilitated meeting where participants are dialoguing their opinions to a consensus to solve a crisis, 'salvation' is not being saved from the crisis itself—the crises is simply being used to introduce and 'justify' the process—'salvation' is 'liberation' from the Father, i.e., 'liberation' from the Father's authority being used to solving the crisis. When anyone tells you "It is not about you," i.e., your insistence upon them doing right and wrong according to "your standards," they are saying it is all about them, i.e., their "feelings," i.e., their "self interests," i.e., their "lust" of the 'moment' which the world is stimulating. Do not be deceived. The truth is, life is all about the Father, and His Son Jesus Christ, with you, in faith, humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining your "self," doing the Father's will, apart from that all you have is "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," only that which is "of the world," i.e., Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud (and the "lake of fire that is never quenched" waiting for you and them).
". . . and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 1:3
Fellowship is based upon discussion, focusing upon being or doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, doing the Father's will, with his "Son," dying for your sins, leading you not as your earthly father, who chastened you after his own pleasure, but as your Heavenly Father, that you might participate in His Holiness. Relationship is based upon dialogue, focusing upon your and others "feeling," i.e., your and their "self interests," i.e., your and their "lusts" that are being stimulated by the world (the situation), that someone is manipulating, i.e., 'justifying.'
"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')
In other words, Karl Marx was saying: "It is 'lust' that 'reconciles us to' 'the world.'" For Karl Marx, if pleasure, i.e., the child's carnal nature, i.e., "lust," which the world stimulates is the 'drive' of life, then the 'purpose' of life must be the augmentation of pleasure, i.e., the child's carnal nature, i.e., "lust" which requires the negation of the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal paradigm, i.e., the father's/Father's "top-down," "right-wrong," "above-below" way of thinking and acting) and the guilty conscience that it engenders in you when you do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") that gets in the way of pleasure, i.e., the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world stimulates. Thus "reconciliation," according to Karl Marx, is between man and man, i.e., the children (the proletariat) and the world, i.e., "building relationship based upon common self interests," i.e., upon pleasure, i.e., "lust," not between God and man (the father and the child, i.e., the King-bourgeoisie and the peasant and proletariat), with man (the child, i.e., the peasant and proletariat) having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the Father's (father's, i.e., the King's-bourgeoisie's) established commands, rules, facts, and truth, doing the Father's (father's, i.e., the King's-bourgeoisie's) will. As you will see (further down in the issue) Karl Marx, rejecting the father's/Father's authority outright (any external source outside of man's carnal nature, why Karl Marx rejected Georg Hegel's use of "spirit," insisting that revolution, i.e., 'change' had to come from within man's nature, not from something or someone external to it), perceived the Heavenly Father's authority as being the product of children (the peasantry) accepting the earthly father's authority (submitting to the King and the bourgeoisie) in their thoughts and in their action, thus requiring the negation of the earthly father's authority (the King and the bourgeoisie) in order to negate the Heavenly Father's authority in the children's (peasantries') thoughts and actions, making his agenda antithetical to the gospel message, which is based upon the Father's authority. Karl Marx was saying, as do those who follow in his footsteps today, without "self" being 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority, "human nature" can not become actualized.
"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50
No believer in Christ, doing the Father's will, can be "actualizing" his "self." No "self-actualizing" person can be a believer in Christ, doing the Father's will. They are antithetical to one another.
"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [their parent's/God's authority aka the father's/Father's authority, i.e., "rule of law"]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost [building relationship with one another based upon what they have in common, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., "human nature" ]."(Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)
"Self-actualization" is the person (the child) becoming at-one-with his "self" and the world ('liberating' his "self" from the father's/Father's authority) 'creating' a "new" world order where "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., "human nature" rules without the father's/Father's restraints, negating the guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders) for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning ("lusting"), so he (the child) can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") with impunity, i.e., with affirmation, i.e., approval from the other children of the world with the same "lusts," accomplishing what Immanuel Kant called "lawfulness without law," i.e., a world where the child's carnal nature rules without the father's/Father's restraints. (Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment)
"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself." "What we call 'conscience' perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves:" (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)
"The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated." "The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior." (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing)
Without the negation of the guilty conscience, which the father's/Father's authority engenders when the child does wrong, disobeys, sins ("lusts"), "self-actualization" can not become a 'reality.' Since there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, i.e., in the child's "self interest," which engenders the "super-ego," it is in dialogue, i.e., in the child's "self interest," "self-actualization" becomes reality, i.e., "lust" is 'justified.'
"The superego 'unites in itself the influences of the present and of the past [with the child's carnal nature, i.e., his "feelings," i.e., his love of pleasure and hate of restraint—experienced in the past as well as being experienced in the present—directing his thoughts and actions].'" (Brown, Life Against Death:)
By the child evaluating (aufheben) the issues (personal-social issues) of the day through dialogue, i.e., from his "sensuous needs," i.e., his carnal desires of the 'moment' and his "sense perception" of the situation, i.e., what he can get out of the situation for his "self," the child's carnal nature, i.e., "sense experience" usurps ("bypasses") the lessons of the past, i.e., history, negating the father's/Father's authority, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth in determining how to respond to the situation, negating his having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders) for being wrong, disobeying, sinning ("lusting") in the process, so he can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") with impunity. By making "human nature," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life" academics, i.e., a "science," man 'liberates' his "self" from the father's/Father's authority.
"O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions [Gr, antithesis] of science falsely so called: Which some professing have erred concerning the faith." 1 Timothy 6:20, 21
"Sense experience must be the basis of all science." "Science is only genuine science when it proceeds from sense experience, in the two forms of sense perception and sensuous need, that is, only when it proceeds from Nature." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)
Behavioral "scientists," i.e., psychologists, i.e., "group psychotherapists," as Marxists, make the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's "sense experience" the foundation from which to know right from wrong, making wrong the father's/Father's authority which gets in the way of the child carnal nature—preventing the child from become his "self," preventing him from becoming at-one-with the world (that engenders pleasure). The role of the psychologist, as is the Marxist, is to "prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space" so the child can become his "self," i.e., at-one-with the world according to his carnal nature only (without having a sense of guilt, i.e., a guilty conscience, which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting"). (Wilfred
"... hatred against patriarchal suppression—a 'barrier to incest,' ... the desire (for the sons) to return to the mother culminat[s] in the rebellion of the exiled sons, the collective killing and devouring of the father." (Sigmund Freud in Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)
Behavioral "science" is built upon the ideology of Sigmund Freud, which, based upon the child's natural (as is Marxism), negates the father's/Father's authority. "'It is not really a decisive matter whether one has killed one's father or abstained from the deed,' if the function of the conflict and its consequences are the same [you do not have to "kill" and "devour" the father if he no longer exercises his authority or has authority over his children in the home, forcing them to do right and not wrong according to his established commands, rules, facts, and truth that go against their nature, i.e., "suppressing" their carnal nature, preventing them from being their "self," "enjoying" ("lusting" after) the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates]." (ibid.)
"Freud noted that patricide and incest are part of man's deepest nature." (Irvin D. Yalom, The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy)
If you want to 'change' something (people), i.e., become a facilitator of 'change' and make the 'change' permanent, you have to know what it is you want to 'change,' i.e., how it functions, in order to know how to 'change' it—today know as "force field analysis," knowing how to "unfreeze, move, and refreeze" individuals through the use of "group dynamics," i.e., their desire for ("lusting" after) the approval of others, i.e., affirmation, in order to initiate and sustain 'change.' Karl Marx, as a facilitator of 'change,' understood what it was he wanted to 'change' and how to 'change' it. The following, written by Karl Marx is quite amazing, i.e., spot on, although he, rejecting accountability before God for his thoughts and actions, made God's agenda only of this life, i.e., "Increase and multiply."
"The unspeculative Christian also recognizes sensuality as long as it does not assert itself at the expense of true reason, i.e., of faith, of true love, i.e., of love of God, of true will-power, i.e., of will in Christ. Not for the sake of sensual love, not for the lust of the flesh, but because the Lord said: Increase and multiply." (Karl Marx The Holy Family)
Karl Marx knew that in order to 'create' a "new" world order, i.e., a world of "ought" out of what "is" you have to know what "is" is and then re-define "is" by excluding any information that gets in the way of "ought" or 'labeling' it as being "inappropriate information" or "negative" in order to accomplish the deed. His "is" lies in man, i.e., in "human nature," i.e., in "sense experience," i.e., in "lust," and in the world that stimulates him, i.e., it, not in an external "is," i.e., in the father's/Father's authority restraining "human nature." The father's/Father's authority is antithetical to psychology and Marxism, i.e., "human nature," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life." "The lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., psychology and Marxism, i.e., "human nature" is antithetical to the father's/Father's authority. Neither can be synthesized , i.e, come to a consensus. Only the child's carnal nature and the world that stimulates it can be synthesized (requiring the negation of the father's/Father's authority). There is only thesis and antithesis, the "Father" and the "children," reconciliation being only possible when the children, humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining their "self" submit their "self" to the Father, walking in the Spirit, doing the Father's will, requiring 'redemption,' the Son covering their sins by his shed blood for them "Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new." 2 Corinthians 5:17 What Karl Marx, and those of the world can not receive, therefore know or understand is the gift of the Holy Spirit God gives to those of faith in Him, i.e., "joy unspeakable," "peace that passes all understanding," and "the love of the Father." 1 Peter 1:8; Philippians 4:7; 1 John 2:15
"And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself [deny his "self," i.e., his "lust of the flesh" and "lust of the eyes"], and take up his cross daily [daily, willingly suffer and endure, as Christ did, the rejection of men because of his refusal to affirm their "lust of the flesh" and "lust of the eyes," where he would have received their approval (praises), i.e., affirmation, which is "the pride of life."], and follow me." Luke 9:23
"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:19, 30; 12:47-50
"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matthew 7:21
"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 1 John 2:15
If "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life." i.e., "that which is of the world only" is all you want, then philosophy (vain speculation) is the answer (Be forewarned: while giving you pleasure or the hope of pleasure in the 'moment,' it can only lead you down the pathway of "self" 'justification' which leads to eternal death—It is not how far down the pathway you have traveled, i.e., "I am not as bad as him," it is that you are on it in the first place. One step on it and you are "in it"). Yet Karl Marx saw a problem with philosophy, that of man coming up with an established answer, i.e., restoring the father's/Father's authority, preventing 'change.'
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways, the objective however, is change." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #11) Inscribed on Karl Marx's tomb.
All children are "philosophers," 1) dissatisfied with how the world "Is," where they, having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth are subject to their parent's authority, not being able to do what they want when they want, 2) thinking (dialoguing with their "self") aka imagining how the world "Ought" to be, where they can do what they want, when the want, and 3) how it "Can" be once the father's/Father's authority is no longer in their way. The problem, according to Karl Marx, et al, is that once children grow up and have children of their own, becoming fathers and mothers themselves they tell (force) their children to do right and not wrong according to their established commands, rules, facts, and truth, telling them what they can and can not do, doing as their parents did, getting in their way, i.e., preventing them from "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, i.e., preventing them from being (becoming) their "self," i.e., preventing 'change.' Without creating a world of dialogue, the child, privately dialoguing within (with) his "self" his love of pleasure and hate of restraint (out of fear of being judged, chastened, condemned, and/or cast out) will remain forever "repressed" by the father's/Father's authority system—since he is not strong enough, by his "self' to overthrow the father/Father and his/His authority system. In fact, according to Karl Marx and his followers it is the child who 'creates' the father's/Father's authority—when he humbles, denies, dies to, controls, disciplines his "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, establishing the father's/Father's will over and therefore against his will.
"The life which he [the child] has given to the object [to the parents and therefore to God—when the child humbles, denies, dies to, disciplines, controls his "self" (stops dialoguing with his "self," i.e., stops "murmuring") in order to do the father's/Father's will] sets itself against him as an alien and hostile force [gets in the way of his carnal nature, i.e., doing what he wants, when he wants, creating in him a guilty conscience when he does wrong, disobeys, sins, i.e., "lusts"—without the "murmuring," i.e., the "self" 'justification, i.e., the dialogue the guilty conscience appears (for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting," i.e., for being "human"]." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)
"Once the earthly family [with children having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth] is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family [with the Son humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining his "self" in order to do the Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth], the former [the earthly father's authority, i.e., the system itself with children having to trust in (have faith in) and obey the father (their parents), their teacher, the laws of the land, etc.,] must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice [in the children's thoughts as well as in their actions—resulting in children no longer "fellowshipping" with one another based upon the father's/Father's (their parents/God's) commands, rules, facts, and truth but, through dialogue, "building relationship" with one another based upon their carnal nature, i.e., their carnal desires, i.e., their "self interests," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment,' 'creating' a "new" world order of "lawfulness without law," i.e., "lawlessness" where the child's carnal nature rules without parental restraint]." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)
"Authoritarian submission [humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will] was conceived of as a very general attitude that would be evoked in relation to a variety of authority figures—parents, older people, leaders, supernatural power, and so forth." "God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority." "Submission to authority, desire for a strong leader, subservience of the individual to the state [parental authority, local control, Nationalism], and so forth, have so frequently and, as it seems to us, correctly, been set forth as important aspects of the Nazi creed that a search for correlates of prejudice had naturally to take these attitudes into account." "The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject's family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem [how to 'liberate' children from parental authority, man from God's authority, mankind from Nationalism aka Fascism, etc., so they can be their "self," i.e., "actualize" their "self," no longer seeing their "self" as being subject to a higher authority other then to their carnal desires of the 'moment']." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)
According to Karl Marx (and Theodor Adorno) the child, not being strong enough to beat up ("kill," i.e., negate) the father (when he can not get his way), out of fear of rejection and "death," submits his "self" to the father's/Father's authority, 'creating' the father's/Father's authority (system) in doing so. Therefore it "takes a village" ("the group"), someone outside to "help" beat up ("kill," i.e., negate), i.e., "bully" the father for the child's sake, "helping" the child via his classroom experience (martyring the "authoritarians," i.e., those students who are "negative," i.e., who are sympathetic to and promoting the father's/Father's authority system in the classroom) to 'liberate' his "self" from the father's/Father's authority system in his thoughts and in his actions. In doing so the child's "ought" (the way the world "ought" to be) becomes the "Is" of the "new" world order ("It is all in how you define 'Is'"), where his "feelings" of the 'moment' (not established commands, rules, facts, and truth) direct his (and societies, i.e., "the groups") thoughts and actions.
"We have to study the conditions which maximize ought-perceptiveness." "Oughtiness is itself a fact to be perceived." "If we wish to permit the facts to tell us their oughtiness, we must learn to listen to them in a very specific way which can be called Taoistic ["sense experienced"]." (Maslow, Farther Reaches)
"Not feeling at home in the sinful world. Critical Criticism must set up a sinful world in its own home [The child not being able to do what he wants, i.e., become at-one-with the world in pleasure (because of his father's authority), must not only resort to dialoguing with his "self," 'justifying' his hatred toward restraint, i.e., his hatred toward the father's/Father's authority but also question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack the father's/Father's authority as well, willing to sacrifice his "self" for the cause]." "Critical Criticism [dialogue, i.e., hostility toward authority being put into action, i.e., praxis, striking out at the father] is a spiritualistic lord, pure spontaneity, actus purus, intolerant of any influence from without." (Karl Marx, The Holy Family) "Critical Criticism" puts the child's "ought" into praxis, negating the father's/Father's authority at all cost.
"The philosophy of praxis [dialogue, i.e., "self" 'justification'] is the absolute secularization of thought, an absolute humanism of history." (Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks)
The lie of praxis is that you can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") with impunity, i.e., without having a sense of guilt, i.e., a guilty conscience (accountability) for your carnal thoughts and carnal actions.
"Rejoice, O young man, in thy youth; and let thy heart cheer thee in the days of thy youth, and walk in the ways of thine heart, and in the sight of thine eyes: but know thou, that for all these things God will bring thee into judgment." Ecclesiastes 11:9
"[E]very one of us shall give account of himself to God." Romans 14:12
There is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process, there is only the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's carnal desires of the 'moment,' i.e., the child's "self interest," i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating. If after being reproved, corrected, and/or chastened for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning ("lusting") the child is still dialoguing with his "self," i.e., 'justifying' his "self," the Karl Marx in him is still alive and well, directing his thoughts and actions.
"The individual may have 'secret' thoughts ["lusts"] which he will under no circumstances reveal to anyone else if he can help it [out of fear of being judged, punished, and/or rejected (cast out)]. To gain access [through getting him or her to dialogue, i.e., to share his or her "feelings," i.e., desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' with others] is particularly important, for here may lie the individual's potential [for 'change,' i.e., to become of and for his or her "self" and the world only—'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority]." (Adorno)
"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)
"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15 I know this verse is quoted above, but bares repeating here.
"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making, our objective centers upon transforming public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)
"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)
All teachers are certified and schools accredited today based upon their use of what are called "Bloom's Taxonomies" (as their curriculum) in the classroom. The "educator" does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home from school, if they were not doing that already (telling them would be "old school," maintaining the "old" world order of being told even if it was done for the 'purpose' of 'change,' i.e., for the 'purpose' of creating a "new" world order), all they have to do is use a curriculum in the classroom that "encourages," i.e., pressures the students to participate in the process of 'change,' i.e., into dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, 'justifying' their carnal nature over and therefore against their parents authority. Being told to be "positive" (supportive of the other students carnal nature) and not "negative" (judging them by their parents standards) pressures students to 'justify' their and the other students love of pleasure and hate of restrain, doing so in order to be approved, i.e., affirmed by "the group," resulting in "the group" labeling those students who, holding onto their parents standards, i.e., refusing to participate in the process of 'change' or fighting against it as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' resisters of 'change,' not "team players," lower order thinkers, in denial, phobic, prejudiced, judgmental, racist, fascist, dictators, anti-social, etc., i.e., "hurting" peoples "feelings" resulting in "the group" rejecting them—the student's natural desire for approval and fear of rejection forces him to participate.
The workplace is following after the same pattern or method, 'labeling' all who inhibit or block the consensus process in the workplace as the children who inhibit or block the consensus process are 'labeled' in the classroom. School to Work is all about making sure the same process is being used in both places, preparing the workers of the future for the workplace, and the workplace for workers of the future.
"'fusion-words' . . . to solve the 'is' and 'ought' problem." "After all that's not so bad. It's really quite human . . ." "The more 'is' something becomes [the more the parent demands obedience], the more 'ought' it becomes [the more the child wants his way (when he continues to dialogue with his "self," i.e., 'justify' his "self"], the louder it 'calls for' particular action [the more the child looks for ways to escape obedience, i.e. justify disobedience, i.e., violence]." (Maslow, Farther Reaches) By using "fusion words" the child's desires and resentment are brought to the surface, 'justifying' his reaction against authority, i.e., against restraint, 'justifying' his hate (violent hate, i.e., 'revolution').
Whoever defines terms for you, controls your life. By redefining terms, using "con-fusion" words (merging "is," i.e., the truth with "ought," i.e., your "lusts," making the truth, what "is," subject to your "lusts," i.e., your opinion, i.e., your "self interest"), revolutionaries have taken over the classroom, the workplace, government, and the "church," making it subject to their globalist agenda ('creating' a "new" world order as they think it "ought" to be, subject to the child's (their) carnal nature and their manipulation of it), negating the father's/Father's authority (the world that "is") in the thoughts and actions of the children so they can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") without having a guilty conscience, i.e., so they can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust") with impunity, i.e., with "the groups," i.e., "the peoples" affirmation. By simply redefining "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," "the pride of life," and "all that is of the world" as "sensuous needs," "sense perception," "sense experience," and "only that which of Nature," Karl Marx made "lust," i.e., "human nature" the 'drive' of life and the 'liberation' of it from the father's/Father's authority the 'purpose,' 'justifying' the negation of anyone (including the unborn, elderly, innocent, and righteous) who got in the way. By redefining "lust" as "enjoying the present" and "only that which is of the world" as "actual" Karl Marx made "reconciliation" between man and the world the agenda of life, negating reconciliation between God and man. By redefining "desperately wicked" as "Critical Criticism," aka "critical theory" and "critical thinking" Karl Marx made human behavior, i.e., the child's action subject to the child's heart, i.e., "lusting" after pleasure, hating restraint, i.e., hating the father's/Father's authority, negating the guilty conscience which the father's/Father's authority engenders, so he can do wrong, disobey, sin ("lust"), doing unconscionable (violent) things against those who get in his way. This is what dialogue does, even in the "church," making what "is," i.e., the Father authority, i.e., God's Word subject to your "ought," i.e., your carnal nature, i.e., your "lust," making you one (in consensus) according to what you have in common with others, your and their "human nature," i.e., your and their"self interests," i.e., your and their "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (which includes the affirmation, i.e., 'justification' of men) which the world ("the group") stimulates.
"[W]e recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and places." "Educational procedures are intended to develop the more desirable rather than the more customary types of behavior." "Only those educational programs which can be specified in terms of intended student behaviors can be classified." "What we are classifying is the intended behavior of students—the ways in which individuals are to act, think, or feel as the result of participating in some unit of instruction." "Obedience and compliance are hardly ideal goals." "Bloom's Taxonomies" are as Benjamin Bloom admited in Book 1:Cognitive Domain "a psychological classification system." "Members of the taxonomy group spent considerable time in attempting to find a psychological theory which would provide a sound basis for ordering the categories of the taxonomy." (Benjamin Bloom, et al., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Book 1: Cognitive Domain) Instead of grading students upon their knowing right from wrong based upon established commands, rules, facts, and truth they are now graded upon their social worth, their willingness to participate with "the group," setting aside, suspending as upon a cross, established commands, rules, facts, and truth in order to 'create' solutions to problems based upon their own "sense experiences" of the past and the present (desiring "the groups" approval, i.e., fearful of "the groups" rejection).
In Book 2, Affective Domain Benjamin Bloom wrote: "Whether or not the classification scheme presented in Handbook I: Cognitive Domain is a true taxonomy is still far from clear." In fact, Benjamin Bloom admitted forty years after the publication of Book 1, Cognitive Domain, "Certainly the Taxonomy was unproved at the time it was developed and may well be 'unprovable.'" (Benjamin Bloom, Forty Year Evaluation) Psychology is not a science, it is only based upon men's opinions, which is subjective, 'labeling' all who depend upon and promote the father's/Father's authority as being "neurotic," needing psychological counseling, i.e., purification, i.e., 'liberation' from the father's/Father's authority.
"Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:11
With the use of "Bloom's Taxonomies," i.e., psychology, i.e., Marxism in the classroom, education went from the teaching of facts and truth, holding children accountable to being right and not wrong to the praxis of behavior modification, i.e., making education subject to the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment.' Instead of education promoting law and order it has 'created' generations of children questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority. This has resulting in 'changes' in our laws and how the courtroom perceives them.
"Laws must not fetter human life ["lust"]; but yield to it; they must change as the needs and capacities ["lusts"] of the people change." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')
By making laws subjective, i.e., subject to the "felt needs" ("lusts") of "the people" (all being subject to "lust") those in power, perceiving their "self interest" as being "the peoples" "self interests," i.e., those who think like them, i.e., "If I feel this way, i.e., love pleasure and hate restraint, everyone one else should feel this way as well, my will (self interest) being their will (self interest), what we all have in common." When a judges "self interest" becomes, in his mind "the peoples" "self interest," a persons "social worth" becomes a part of the legal system, negating the individual's rights (protection), under God, i.e., "rule of law" is negated.
"Jurisprudence of terror takes two forms; loosely defined rules which produces unpredictable law, and spontaneous changes in rules to best suit the state." (R. W. Makepeace and Croom Helm, Marxist Ideology and Soviet Criminal Law)
This is what traditional minded student face daily in the praxis of dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (psychology, i.e., Marxism) in the classroom. While trying to defend their position, i.e., their parent's, i.e., the father's/Father's authority they are being 'labeled' as resisters to 'change,' i.e., intolerant of others, prejudiced, etc., being required to be "tolerant" of those who question, challenge, defy, disregard, and attack authority instead (to be accepted by "the group," i.e., by "the people"),. This is the same praxis being applied in the courtroom today where victims of a crime are accused of being perpetrators of a "crime" when they, instead of being tolerant and "understanding" of the perpetrators situation, i.e., his "feelings" that lead up to the crime as well as his "feeling" in the 'moment,' accuse him of being wrong, needing to be punished, thus preventing him from becoming his "self," i.e., "self-actualized." As stated above, when "self-interest," i.e., a person's social worth becomes a part of the court's decision, the individuals rights (protection), under God are negated. This way of thinking begins in the child's upbringing, i.e., in the classroom.
"Has authority been banished in these later days? Has the world reached a point where it will condone the formation of pupil soviets?" (Will C. Woods, Superintendent of Public Instruction of the State of California, March 1921) Notice the date and where the statement was made.
"The child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns [paradigm] which are set by the adult leader of the group." (Kurt Lewin in Wilbur Brookover, A Sociology of Education)
"Change in methods of leadership is probably the quickest way to bring about a change in the cultural atmosphere of a group." "Any real change of the culture [paradigm] of a group is, therefore, interwoven with the changes of the power constellation within the group." (Barker, Dembo, & Lewin, "frustration and regression: an experiment with young children" in Child Behavior and Development)
'Change' the classroom curriculum and you 'change' the world. Change the classroom curriculum from the father's/Father's authority ruling to where the father's/Father's authority is negated, and the child's carnal nature rules the world, with those manipulating the classroom (psychologists, i.e., Marxists, i.e., facilitators of 'change') in control.
"A change in the curriculum is a change in the people concerned—in teachers, in students, in parents ....." "Curriculum change means that the group involved must shift its approval from the old to some new set of reciprocal behavior patterns." "... people involved who were loyal to the older pattern [paradigm] must be helped to transfer their allegiance to the new." "Re-education aims to change the system of values and beliefs [paradigm] of an individual or a group." (Kenneth D. Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)
"To create effectively a new set of attitudes and values [paradigm], the individual must undergo great reorganization of his personal beliefs and attitudes and he must be involved in an environment which in many ways is separated from the previous environment in which he was developed." "...many of these changes are produced by association with peers who have less authoritarian points of view, as well as through the impact of a great many courses of study in which the authoritarian pattern is in some ways brought into question while more rational and nonauthoritarian behaviors are emphasized." (Book 2: Affective Domain)
During the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process the participants take on the living personification of "the people," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," their "feelings" ("lusts") becoming "the peoples feelings" ("lusts") and visa versa (in their mind), making any who resist them, resisters of "the people." As new people, with differing "self interests" ("lusts") participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process and others leave, i.e., are excluded from participation, discouraged and leave, or told to leave for the "good" of "the people," the "self interests" of "the people" 'change,' i.e., laws 'change,' progressively moving laws and "the people" in the direction of socialism, where "the leaders interests" are "the peoples interests" and "the peoples interests" are "the leaders interests," at least in theory if not in practice, progressively "filtering" out laws that get in the way of 'change,' i.e., "lust," i.e., negating "rule of law." Contracts with "the people" are therefore always readily adaptable to 'change' based upon the "feelings," i.e., "self interests" ("lusts") of those establishing policy in the consensus meeting of the 'moment'—making 'change's' in law for "the people," i.e., to actualize their (those in the consensus meeting) "self interest." Whether used in education, in the workplace, in government, or even in the "church" the outcome is always the same, the negation of the "Father," i.e., the father's/Father's authority in making decision, replacing it with "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., the carnal nature of the child, resulting in that which is only "of and for self" and "the world," i.e., "despots" in control.
"The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the guardian of the public weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them."
"If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for, though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit which the use can at any time yield." (George Washington Farewell Speech—compared to Lenin's)
Limited, representative, constitutional government ("rule of law"), with its checks and balances (separation of departments) is based upon the father's authority in the home, where the father, as King, has the right of private convictions, private property, private business, etc., with 'limited' government encroachment. In this form of government the father is the constituent (the citizen) sending his representative (his child) to re-present him, i.e., his position at the store, buying his goods at the store (legislative chamber) with his money (tax dollars). If the child (the representative) decides to spend the father's (the constituent's) money on his "self," i.e., on his "self interests" instead, the father no longer sends him to the store, sending someone else (another child) in his place, who he can trust, i.e., who will re-present him. There is no representation in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process. i.e., in a facilitated meeting, there is only the "self interest" of those present in the room. By applying the consensus process (by-partisanship) in government, which is built upon 'discovering' and establishing laws based upon the "representative's" (the children's) "self interest" of the 'moment' which the world stimulates—which the globalists, i.e., facilitator's of 'change' manipulate—the constituent (the father) no longer has true re-presentation. If the children gain access to the father's (the constituent's) credit card they can run him into debt as they spend his money on their "self," i.e., on their "self interests." Hum!!! Sounds like today—what George Washington warned us about at the start. But then who studies history these day? Certainly not our politicians, much less the citizens. They are too busy, like children "enjoying" ("lusting" after) the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, following after Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud.
"The justice of state constitutions is to be decided not on the basis of Christianity, not from the nature of Christian society but from the nature of human society." "The state arises out of the exigencies of man's nature." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')
The "church" has the most blame for this. The 'moment' the minister of the "church" brings the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process, i.e., Marxism, i.e., psychology into the "church" the "church" becomes apostate and the minister becomes a "wolf in sheepskin," marketing the bride of Christ on the street corner as a prostitute—for his own pleasure and gain. Woe be to the man who uses the bride of Christ for his own gain. While he might relish and bask in the praises of men in this life, at his death he is meeting the groom (full of wrath against him), resulting in him not falling into "a bottomless abyss," but instead, along with Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, and all who follow after them, 'justifying' their "self," i.e., their "lust of the flesh," "lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life" being cast (the Greek word is "hurled") into the "lake of fire that is never quenched."
"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4
The pathway to "Utopia," i.e., the "new" world order is strewn with the bodies of those who got in the way of pleasure, i.e., "lust"—including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous.
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4
Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.
"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17
Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.
"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12
"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them." Romans 1:28-32
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020